Ebert is reviewing again!
2008-09-12
I'm so glad Roger Ebert is reviewing again. If you've only thought of him as the “thumbs up” guy, I hope to change your mind.
I feel like I've been in part-time film school with him since 1994, when I started reading his wonderfully-written in-depth reviews of every new movie released, every Friday on his site.
His analysis makes movies richer, always calling my attention to finer aspects of a film I never would have noticed. Here's an example from his review of Dark City:
Sometimes during the shot-by-shot analysis, we simply froze a frame and regarded it. Some of the street scenes echo paintings by Edward Hopper or Jack Vettriano. This is not only a beautiful film but a generous one, which supplies rich depth and imagination and many more details than are really necessary to tell the story. Small wonder that the name Bumstead appears, perhaps in honor of Henry Bumstead, one of the greatest Hollywood art directors. The world created by the Strangers seems borrowed from 1940s film noir; we see fedoras, cigarettes, neon signs, automats, older cars (and some newer ones -- the world is not consistent).
Proyas likes deep-focus compositions. Many interior spaces are long and narrow. Exteriors look down one street to the vanishing point, and then the camera pans to look down another street, equally long. The lighting is low-key and moody. The color scheme depends on blacks, browns, shadows and the pallor of the Strangers; warmer colors exist in human faces, in neon signs and on the billboard for Shell Beach. “I am simply grateful for this shot,” I said in Hawaii more than once. “It is as well-done as it can possibly be.” Many other great films give you the same feeling -- that their makers were carried far beyond the actual requirements of their work into the passion of creating something wonderful.
That last line applies to Ebert as well. He is so passionate about appreciating films that his reviews go far beyond requirements, always insisting on a thorough insightful review.
Proof of passion: his tough battle with thyroid cancer kept him in the hospital for most of the last few years. His every-Friday reviews stopped. My 12-year-old weekly ritual stopped! But even though he can never speak again, his written reviews have started again a few weeks ago, as great as ever, which is why I'm posting this now. This man lives for movies. Read his Wikipedia page for more details about his personal life, if interested.
Bookmark this: The Great Movies
Bookmark The Great Movies, where he writes deep reviews of the most important films of all time. Read through some every time you're thinking of renting a movie or adding to your NetFlix queue. Your life will be richer because of it.
Bookmark this: New Movie Reviews
Bookmark his new movie reviews, for those times when you'd like to head out to see a movie. You'll often disagree with him about fun, dumb entertainment, but his reviews can always call your attention to something new.
Awesome! Roger Ebert is a true film scholar, sans the academic snobbishness so often found in other intellectuals and "experts." You said it Derek, Roger is authentically passionate about film. I hope he continues teaching all of us about cinema art for years to come.
Wow Derek, thanks so much for posting this. I love movies but am fairly certain I have terrible taste.
I'm excited to have a new resource to check out so at least I can speak intelligently about my terrible movies.
I started following your blog pretty recently and your posts are consistently apropos and awesome.
Likewise, thanks for alerting me about this. I love reading film reviews more than I love watching them. Both in music and film, I appreciate an intelligent taste-maker whose judgments and tastes I can trust. That kind of person is more useful than picking movies or music based on popular consensus, as you don't necessarily like what everybody likes.
I think well-articulated opinions are valuable, especially in today's internet world. Taste makers and trend setters can play a different role than simple here's-what-everybody-likes aggregation. On that note, I'm starting my personal music review site -- a blog where I review only the music I love -- in hopes of building a community of like-minded listeners and musicians (who may then get interested in my music, too!).
I don't have much yet, but here is a little seedling:
http://smartmusicreview.com
ari
I've been checking out Roger Ebert's reviews since his "Sneak Preview" days with Gene Siskel and kept watching him on TV with Richard Roeper unitl he couldn't do the show anymore (I kept watching the show even after that until Richard Roeper's recent departure and the ABC networks recent and horrible re-tooling of the show).
For years he (along with Gene Siskel, and Richard Roeper) have helped to make me award of films that I might never have heard about. I have always admired how they championed films that otherwsie might have gotten lost in the shuffle.
You might also want to check out his blog page
http://blogs.suntimes.com/ebert/